Hi,
I was checking the 2025 CfP and I couldn’t find any guidelines for reviewers.
I think it would be useful to have some general principles to make reviewing criteria somehow more uniform.
Just one example: is it appropriate for a reviewer to negatively evaluate the results of an article because the authors didn’t use a larger (paid) LLM?
I know (I hope!) this is probably a case on which the CHR community would agree that beating the SotA and “going big” are not our research goals. Anyway, I think it would be useful to be explicit about this.